What Are The Alternatives to Vanta?
Vanta is one of the best-known tools for automating SOC 2 compliance. However, many organisations are now looking for alternatives to Vanta, whether for greater flexibility, support or credibility with auditors and customers.
Discover 5 alternatives to Vanta below.
Why look for an alternative to Vanta?
Vanta is often seen as a quick solution for structuring a SOC 2 compliance approach. However, for many organisations, using an automation tool alone quickly shows its limitations, which is why some are now looking for an alternative to Vanta.
The limits of automation alone : Automation makes it easier to gather evidence and monitor controls, but it does not replace the professional judgement required by SOC 2. Compliance is not just about checklists, it is about understanding the risks, processes and context of the organisation.
An operational burden that is still very real : A tool like Vanta does not remove the internal work. Teams have to configure controls, manage alerts, analyse discrepancies and respond to the auditor. Without support, this burden can quickly increase.
The complexity of interpreting SOC 2 requirements : SOC 2 is based on professional judgements, not strictly standardised rules. A tool can flag up deviations, but it cannot determine whether a control is actually relevant to the organisation.
Limited adaptation to the realities of each organisation : Each company has its own constraints: size, industry, maturity and regulatory issues. A one-size-fits-all approach can lead to ill-adapted or excessive controls, hence the need for a more personalised approach.
1. A human auditor SOC 2
SOC 2 is based on professional judgements, not simply the completion of checklists. A human auditor offers structured support from start to finish, from the initial analysis through to the production of the SOC 2 report. It helps to clarify requirements, explain what is really expected and avoid erroneous or excessive interpretations of SOC 2 criteria.
This approach significantly reduces errors, last-minute adjustments and round-trips with the auditor, while saving real time for in-house teams, who can concentrate on their core activities.
Tools vs. support: two different approaches
Tools like Vanta act as platforms that centralise information and automate certain compliance tasks. They can be useful as support, but they do not make decisions.
Conversely, a human auditor provides expertise, professional judgement, appropriate advice and credible validation of the approach.
2. Drata
Drata is a recognised compliance automation platform for SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
It is aimed primarily at fast-growing SaaS start-ups, with advanced automation of evidence gathering and control monitoring.
Drata stands out for its strong integration with cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP) and current security tools.
3. Secureframe
Secureframe has a simple, accessible interface, making it easy for non-specialist compliance teams to adopt.
The platform is often a good choice for SMEs and start-ups that want to structure their compliance quickly.
It supports several compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS), making it a versatile multi-framework solution.
4. Sprinto
Sprinto is positioned as a fast-to-deploy solution, particularly suited to cloud-native businesses.
Its approach focuses on the right balance between cost and efficiency, with automated workflows for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance.
It is often preferred by organisations looking for rapid implementation with minimum complexity.
5. Thoropass
Thoropass adopts a hybrid approach, combining a software platform with integrated human support.
This combination is particularly appreciated in more regulated sectors such as FinTech or HealthTech, where interpretation of requirements and credibility are essential.
Comparison table - Alternatives to Vanta
Criteria | Human SOC 2 Auditor | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto | Thoropass |
Type of approach | Human-led | Automation tool | Automation tool | Automation tool | Hybrid approach |
Level of automation | Low to variable (depending on tools used) | High | High | High | Medium |
Professional judgment | Very high | Limited | Limited | Limited | Partial |
SOC 2 interpretation | Context-aware | Standardized | Standardized | Standardized | Assisted |
Customization to organization | High | Limited | Limited | Limited | Medium |
Human support | Full | Minimal | Minimal | Minimal | Integrated |
Internal workload for teams | Low | High | High | High | Medium |
Credibility with clients/investors | Very high | Depends on the audit | Depends on the audit | Depends on the audit | High |
Supported frameworks | SOC 2 (and others depending on engagement) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | Multiple frameworks | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | Multiple frameworks |
Ideal profile | SMEs, growing companies, organizations seeking credibility | Fast-growing SaaS startups | SMEs & startups | Cloud-native startups | FinTech, HealthTech |
Core value proposition | Advisory, validation, credibility | Centralization and monitoring | Simplicity and speed | Cost efficiency | Tool + expertise |
Making a success of your SOC 2 with an approach aligned with your reality
Are you wondering whether Vanta is really the best option for your organisation? Choosing a SOC 2 approach is more than just selecting a tool: it must take into account your context, your level of maturity, your internal resources and the expectations of your customers or partners.
Our SOC 2 certification experts will work with you to assess your needs, clarify your issues and structure a credible and effective approach. Whether it's a tool-based, human or hybrid approach, the objective remains the same: to enable you to demonstrate your SOC 2 compliance in a clear, reliable way that's tailored to your reality.